An Expectant People

Posted on December 16, 2016 by smaxreisert

One of my favorite parts of Advent is the annual visit with the two pregnant women, Mary and Elizabeth. Although the lectionary often curtails that section of Luke, reducing it to Mary’s Song of Praise, I always include the section just before the Magnificat, when Mary travels to Elizabeth and the two women greet each other, both very much aware of each other’s state of being “with child.”

When I was pregnant with my second child, my best friend at the time was also pregnant. Her daughter was born just a few weeks before my son. The shared experience of pregnancy was powerful. Although I knew plenty of people who could empathize with me during my first pregnancy, it was a completely different experience to be walking the same road at the same time with a close friend.

While we shared our hopes and dreams for our children not yet born, we also spent a great deal of time supporting each other through those less poetic aspects of pregnancy—morning sickness, an increasingly unfamiliar body, the barrage of strange tests, the invasions into one’s personal space, and all of the other indignities of pregnancy.

I’d like to think that Mary and Elizabeth did at least some of the same. I’d like to think that Mary and Elizabeth supported and encouraged each other, that they formed a little community unto themselves that carried them through those few months that they spent together.

Christianity’s patriarchal, male-dominated history (and present) has unfortunately missed the rich and meaningful story of the expectant women about whom the Gospel writer Luke wrote. It is remarkable that, as we visit the Christmas story year after year, Christians tend to glide quickly and carelessly over Mary and Elizabeth. And, to the extent that we visit them at all, we focus almost entirely on Mary’s Song of Praise. Certainly, the Song of Praise is deserving of attention. But, there’s lots more, and so much of it valuable material for considering our faith.

As Christians, our faith is constantly in a state of expectancy. Even as we meet Christ, our understanding is only partial. We are called to travel the path of faith, seeing bit by bit, always expecting, always anticipating—as a pregnant woman.

Something is always in the process of being born. God’s purposes are always making themselves known. And, we are people who participate in that—in that birthing process, in that revealing process. We are the ones who are called to notice the small signs of new life and new hope, and to be about the business of allowing God to lead us in ways that help bring that new life to its fulfillment.

Mary was not simply a delivery system for the Son of God, but the person who nurtured that new life, the first one to wonder about what this was all about, the one who first got a sense of who this Jesus was going to be, through his movement and life in her womb. And, for some part of that journey, she traveled with Elizabeth, also pregnant, and they were together—encouraging and supporting each, wondering and hoping with each other, focused on bringing new life into a chaotic and violent world.

Mary and Elizabeth provide a model for us as God’s people, that we too are to be with each other. We hope and dream together. We support and encourage each other. And, we ought always to be attentive to new life—in its wonder as well as in the discomfort and strangeness it brings. And, we ought also to be in community, an expectant people.

Posted in Bible, Holy-Days | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Remembering—For Christians

Posted on December 9, 2016 by smaxreisert

This week, as I perused the various newspapers and news sources I typically look at every morning, I wasn’t surprised to find several pleas regarding the significance of “remembering.” More specifically, we were called to “remember” Pearl Harbor Day, December 7. There are, of course, other tragic days for which we are asked to remember—September 11, November 22, etc.

I can’t help but wonder: what are we remembering and why? Shall we remember those who died, the families torn apart? Shall we remember the sense of community that follows national tragedy? Shall we remember the sense of vengeance that also tends to follow, especially in cases where our country has been attacked?

I wonder about remembering, and I wonder about wondering about remembering. The calls to remember seem often to include a companion piece to the remembering, and that is “never again.” Yet, tragedies continue, big ones as well as small ones, the ones we choose to hold up for mass memorial as well as the ones that happen unnoticed, unacknowledged, unremembered.

As Christians, we also do a lot of remembering. We “remember” the birth of Jesus, even though we don’t really know when it happened, or exactly its circumstances (as difficult as it may be for some Christians, Matthew and Luke differ on the details; Mark and John are completely silent). We “remember” the important last days of Jesus—his entry into Jerusalem, his last supper with his closest friends, his trial and execution, his burial in a tomb, and then the mysterious (and terrifying) third day when the tomb was found empty. Jesus had become for us Jesus Christ, the Messiah, the Risen One.

We do a lot of “remembering.” Our remembering, though, is not simply meant to remind us of something important. Our remembering is meant to invite us in, to make us a part of the story, to understand the transformative nature of Christ as Christ continues to live and breathe among us, as we declare ourselves to be Christ’s followers.

But, we Christians too, can get caught in the problematic ways of remembering, as if the simple act of remembering, of observing, of engaging in the ritual of holy-days, is what we are called to do as people of faith. Especially around Christmas (and Easter too), I notice the pull of tradition—favorite hymns (sung with traditional words), well-known bible passages (read from traditional translations), etc.

Remembering through favorite hymns and familiar Bible passages is not in and of itself a problem. The problem emerges when the familiar and traditional become simple acts of a sort of spectator sport. When we sing familiar words just because we know them by heart, when we fall into the rhythm of familiar scripture story, and allow that to be enough, to be all of our observance, then remembering is nothing more than empty ceremony.

Holy-days, Christmas certainly among them, must be more than that.

It’s not that we should remove all that is comfortable and familiar. We should instead be willing to invite not only an element or two that is new and different, but also to allow our hearts and minds to be open to new awareness even in the most familiar of the season, to allow wonder and awe to be actively part of who we are and what we do.

In a busy season, it’s not easy to invite something new, to engage with the unfamiliar. In fact, it can be precisely in that busyness of the season that causes us to crave the comfort of our traditional observances—when our sanctuaries become in significant ways, actual sanctuary from the hustle and bustle of the world around us.

But, we are indeed called—again and again—to accept the invitation into the story. We are not to gaze from afar into that manger scene, but to see who we are in the story, and to consider the different sorts of roles we play over the years of lives of faith.

For our faith to be truly meaningful, we must be willing to open ourselves to the new—for the very point of our gathering is to be drawn in by the vulnerable infant, God incarnate, born in a stable (or wherever), but most importantly, born in our hearts, even if for the hundredth time.

The Christian faith is not just about remembering, about memorializing, capturing something special from the past. Our remembering is something very different. It is about living and entering into new life, day after day, holy day after holy day, welcoming the surprises of our living, still speaking God. The coming into our lives as an infant is just the beginning.

Posted in Holy-Days, Worship | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The First Word of Advent: Hope

Posted on December 2, 2016 by smaxreisert

Old South’s worship last Sunday, the Sunday after Thanksgiving, included quite a few visitors. One visitor was a young man who came to worship by himself. He stayed for coffee and fellowship, so I had a chance to chat with him a bit. He readily admitted that he doesn’t know much about church and wasn’t raised in a church. When I asked him why he had joined us, he paused and considered and then said something like, “Well, because of what you talked about today.”

This young man was not alone. I have lots of people who are worried about the future, disappointed and even despairing over the recent presidential election. I’ve heard comment after comment reflecting pain and sadness, even to the point of hopelessness. In turn, my sermons have sought to address at least some of what I’m hearing.

For those who are long-time churchgoers, Advent is a season of familiar words—hope, peace, joy and love. The familiar words, though, now have taken on something new. What does it mean to hope when everything feels so terrible?

This past Sunday, my sermon offered some thoughts based on a recent experience at a YMCA swim meet (my son is a swimmer). I couldn’t help but notice the array of children and youth, as well as their families, at the meet. Maine is a very pale place, among the whitest of states in the entire country. At the swim meet, though, there was a noticeable diversity of skin color, hair texture, shape of face and eye. Sure, most of the people there were white. But, not all.

And, there they were, this array of children and youth, talking, laughing and goofing off with each other, competing against each other in a friendly way, encouraging each other and cheering each other on.

My first reaction to this tableau was worry and concern. What kind of world awaits these children and young people, as we learn about the “alt right” and the newly energized white supremacists and nationalists? The president-elect may choose to distance himself from these groups, but the lead up to the election has given some very dangerous people, usually on the far fringes of society, a new energy and sense of purpose.

Although there was plenty of discord before the election, the post-election landscape offers a deeper, and more treacherous, feeling of division. Yet, there are moments deserving of hope. In looking upon the young people I saw in action at the swim meet, I was reminded that scene didn’t just happen by itself. It didn’t just materialize out of magic. It came to be not just because of policies and laws either.

It came to be because of a lot of invisible actions of normal, everyday, good and decent people—like those who attend Old South.

When we look for hope and signs of hope, we so often cast about for what’s “out there,” something that will bring hope to us.

Advent and Christmas remind us, in very direct and significant ways, that faith is not a spectator sport. Faith depends on participation, and that includes our first word of Advent: hope.

Hope isn’t just “out there,” something for which we wait patiently in a detached sort of way, like a gift waiting to be opened. Hope is in each of us, and in all of us together as church, as a community of faith, as a community of followers of Christ.

When we are feeling a little bereft of hope, it’s a good time to take a good look around and take a look in the mirror as well. In the small actions and moments of our lives we have the opportunity, the calling, to live out of hope, to live out the vision of being in community even with those who seem so different—the wolf and the lamb, the leopard and the kid, the cow and the bear.

Hope doesn’t just happen, as if by magic. It’s takes effort, a conscious effort, an effort that many have already been about.

Do you remember at the end of the Wizard of Oz, after the curtain was pulled away and the wizard became not the great and powerful, but a regular man, and Dorothy’s companions thought that all of their efforts to do as the Wizard had commanded, that that was the only way to get their true heart’s desire, that all of that had come to nothing, because here was this sad, regular man and not the powerful wizard before whom they had cowered? But, still it was the wizard who showed them that what they sought, they possessed all along—a brain, a heart, some courage. It had all been there. They just couldn’t see it.

It seems to me that we are at a time when we shouldn’t be spending much time looking for hope “out there,” waiting for the magic to happen. Part of the anticipation of Advent is the coming to that knowledge that what we long for, we already have—that to be among God’s people, to have faith in Christ, to follow in the Way, is to be renewed in knowing that God doesn’t bestow these things as if they will fall from the sky one day in a big box topped with a large bow. We have already been given us the pieces we need. It is up to us to discover them, to rediscover them, and to let them capture us, and to recapture us.

Advent seems different this year—and the familiar words, too. It feels like we are not just trotting out the comfortable ritual in the preparation for Christmas. Instead, we have the opportunity to reconnect with some of the most vital aspects of faith. The first word is hope. It’s not an empty word, nor is it an easy word. We people of faith know this. Yet, we hope and we live as a hopeful people—because we know that there’s reason to hope. It is fragile and vulnerable, just as an infant, but real and present.

Posted in On the Hopeful Side, Worship | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Clergy Get Over Yourselves!

Posted on November 26, 2016 by smaxreisert

“Do you read the sermons ahead of time?” was one of the first questions that was asked. It was a surprising, unexpected question. It was asked almost tentatively, cautiously, but directly at me.

I was sitting at the front of a classroom, with one Old South parishioner on my left and two at my right. We were leading a panel on lay leadership of worship during the workshop section of the Maine Conference United Church of Christ Annual Meeting in October.

The questioner was sincere and serious in her asking, wondering if I—as the clergy person at Old South—made an effort to review and approve sermons given by the lay people of my congregation when I’m away.

The questioner, it turned out, was not alone. There were others who listened in almost awestruck silence to our tales not only of lay leadership of worship, but increased lay participation, in the worship life of Old South. Several people chimed in after that first questioner, wondering how we did it, and even more shockingly, how the lay people managed to get their pastor—me—to back off from trying to control everything.

I was a bit taken aback by the tone that erupted from some of these questions, from lay people who seemed eager to participate more in worship, but felt held back by the control issues of their own pastor. I should freely admit that I’ve had my own control and authority issues in the past, and still struggle with them from time to time. But, I have learned that through giving up some of that control and inviting more participation, I have/we have gained in important and significant ways.

Clergy, get over yourselves!

As we witness and live out the changes in our churches and in our culture, it is certainly time to learn how to share, and to learn to let go. By maintaining control, clergy risk strangling new life and crushing the movement of the Holy Spirit.

At the end of our workshop, a long-time Maine pastor came up to me to voice her concerns. She was especially troubled that Old South has an open sign up for serving communion. “Don’t you teach them anything before you allow them to serve communion?” she asked bluntly. “Don’t you think they need to know what they are doing?” she continued, shocked and disturbed by our unorthodox approach.

No, I told her. While I always provide context and story at the start of every communion service for everyone in the sanctuary, I no longer endeavor to control what people “know” or should know. People learn by participating, sharing, taking part. Communion is a sacrament. I’ve learned to let it be so.

I’m sure there are people who help in the serving communion who have very different ideas about what’s going on. I’m sure there are lay sermons I would not like. But, the church is not about me. As “pastor and teacher,” I have a vital role in guiding and leading, but I also recognize the significance and integrity of each person’s journey, as well as the journey we take as a congregation. I may be the “captain,” but that doesn’t mean I can, or should, be a sort of spiritual dictator.

We are church in a time of dramatic change. Clergy must learn to lead in new ways, and to encourage shared ministry. As we have learned at Old South, more participation brings more vitality. Vitality is not measured solely in the numbers of “butts in pews,” but in the sense of connection and commitment to faithfulness of the Gospel. At Old South, we are smaller in number, but larger in spirit.

The clergy role is to support, to encourage, to guide, to teach and to share—and actively and faithfully invite the Spirit.

Posted in My Life as Pastor | Tagged , | 1 Comment

As Maine Goes? Heaven Help Us

Posted on November 14, 2016 by smaxreisert

Be angry but do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger.
Ephesians 4:26
A fool gives full vent to anger, but the wise quietly holds it back.
Proverbs 29:11
But now you must get rid of all such things—anger, wrath, malice, slander, and abusive language from your mouth. . . . As God’s chosen ones, holy and beloved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, meekness, and patience. Bear with one another and, if anyone has a complaint against another, forgive each other; just as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive. Above all, clothe yourselves with love, which binds everything together in perfect harmony.
Colossians 3:8, 12-14

“As Maine Goes, So Goes the Nation,” was a phrase from awhile back that described Maine’s uncanny ability to serve as a bellwether for presidential elections. This time around, Hillary Clinton won 48% of the vote in Maine, to Donald Trump’s 45%. Still, Maine may turn out to be a different sort of bellwether and, in that regard, let us hope and pray that that turns out not to be true.

Maine has a governor who likes to “speak his mind” and “tell it like it is.” He governs mostly through bullying, blustering and throwing tantrums. He has offered many statements and pronouncements that indicate that he’s a sexist, racist, homophobe, xenophobe, Islamophobe—you get the picture. He also limits access of the press. Sound familiar?

Despite the fact that Maine’s Governor is in his second term, the situation is no better for the poor, the vulnerable, the unskilled, etc. and is probably worse in most instances. The situation might be a little better for the wealthy, as they have benefited from the tax cuts that have been “paid for” through cuts in services and revenue sharing.

Yet, the angry seem to love Governor LePage. Anger, though, it turns out, doesn’t get things done and it doesn’t actually make the lives of the angry any better.

Governor LePage tends to speak before he listens. He declares before thinking. He relies on unproven assumptions. Many of his opinions are based in old stereotypes that are not true, and probably never were. He’s suspicious of those “from away” (and that means anyone not from Maine) and closes himself off from anyone who might pull him away from his tidy, comfortable nest made up of the sticks and stones he likes to throw at people who dare to disagree with him.

Yet, the angry of the state seem to love the Governor, and are drawn to his “telling it like it is” and “speaking his mind.”

Maine offers an important object lesson: anger doesn’t translate into good or effective governing. Let us hope that Mr. Trump chooses a different path for governing and doesn’t follow his new friend Paul LePage.

The Bible offers many verses that remind us of the corrosive nature of anger and the foolishness of allowing anger to be one’s guide. There are things that happen in life that can lead to anger, sometimes even a completely appropriate righteous anger. The problem seems to be when people get settled in their anger, when anger itself becomes the soothing balm, instead of understanding anger as a first step on a path to solve problems that includes the one who is angry.

Though Mr. Trump doesn’t seem to know much about the Bible, perhaps some of those who do who voted for him will find the wherewithal to begin to consider the role of anger in our country. And now that we have a whole new segment of angry people, in those whose candidate did not win the White House despite winning a significant percentage of the popular vote, we ought to take heed of the ancient advice offered in scripture and to reflect on the anger that has gained a significant foothold.

The way forward is likely not going to be easy. There will be anger. And some of that anger will be justified. But, anger cannot be the end or the goal. Anger cannot become the place of comfort, our refuge in times of trouble. The Bible holds significant and serious cautions in regard to anger. May we take heed before anger gets the best of us.

Posted in Maine Cautionary Tales, Misc | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Day After: 11/9/16

Posted on November 9, 2016 by smaxreisert

In the last couple of weeks, as I listened to more than a few parishioners share their worry and concern not so much about Election Day itself, but its aftermath, I scheduled a prayer circle for Election Day at noon. Good thing I didn’t schedule it for today. I’m not sure I’m ready to talk or to pray.

As I gathered in the sanctuary with the couple of people who came yesterday, I felt nearly entirely convinced that we were praying for a very different place than I woke up to this morning. Yesterday, I felt confident, mostly, that we were praying for reconciliation, a coming together of sorts, a way forward for those who seem so angry, disconnected and disillusioned—but that I would not be among the angry, disconnected, and disillusioned.

Yet, here I am, feeling those feelings I wasn’t expecting to feel.

What happened? What does this mean? I can’t help but wonder how much of this is about body parts. Has Trump exposed and unleashed, among the many things that he has exposed and unleashed (racism, homophobia, a deep suspicion regarding immigrants, etc.), a wariness, even a hatred, for people who happen to be female?

In the little bit of radio I’ve listened to this morning, comments have been made about the media’s inability to understand the extent of voter discontent. But, is that it? Is it about anger at Washington, or is the anger at Washington masking something else—sexism, misogyny?

Not long ago, I found myself wondering if I would feel so triumphant at the election of the first female president, given that her opponent had said so many vile things about so many people, and so many kinds of people. How could she lose? How could enough people vote for someone who seemed to just bluster his way through election season, saying one outrageous thing after another? Would I feel, then, that the victory was not quite so victorious, not quite so triumphant?

And, now here I am at my dining room table with my mug of coffee wondering what kind of country I live in. How can so many people be so angry as to overlook the inadequacies and the dangers of the Republican nominee? And, how much of this is all about gender, that people were willing to overlook Trump’s liabilities, vast and problematic as they are, just because they couldn’t vote for a woman?

I’ll admit that I have not been the most enthusiastic Hillary supporter. I’ve never liked her husband (I was one of those rare Democrats who thought he should have resigned over the Lewinsky business, that what he did with the White House intern in the Oval Office was not “private”—how different would the world be if he had resigned?) and I’ve often wondered about Hillary and what she’s been willing to put up with with her husband—while I also realize that she was damned one way or the other. Her own ethical problems have also been a concern, but really, were her ethical lapses worse than Donald Trump’s? I cannot fathom.

Yesterday, though, as I filled in that little bubble next to her name, I felt a little thrill at the thought of a smart, experienced, capable woman as President.

Now, it’s all come apart. I live in a country that prefers seemingly anyone, even a demagogue, instead of a woman.

The prayers that we prayed yesterday in Old South’s sanctuary, I wonder what they mean in this world turned upside down. Will all of those angry people wish to seek reconciliation with someone like me? Will all of those angry, discontented people, now victorious, extend a hand of neighborliness, recognizing that I am the one now discontented and angry? Will we find something that we can reasonably agree on as the common good and will we be able to work together toward that place? Will we be able to speak, listen and hear one another, to figure out some way to acknowledge the great chasm that seems to have opened up?

I’m not so sure. When the dust settles, I hope that I will feel more hopeful, that we will not find ourselves in a sea of discontent, but rather a place that acknowledges all of the various things that have led us to this, from all sides. And, then a desire to pick up the pieces and work together.

This is a place where the Church must step up and encourage the faithful to live out the faith, in loving neighbor and seeking the welfare of the vulnerable. This is also a time when the Church must get clearer in its view on and about women. The Christian Church has certainly been complicit in the denigration of women—and much of that not at all based on scripture. May we seek not so much to follow our new leader, but our true Leader. If we are endeavoring to be “great” (whatever that means), the first step, surely, is to begin to be boldly honest with each other and with ourselves.

Posted in Misc | Tagged , | Leave a comment

This Writing Life, Part 2

Posted on November 2, 2016 by smaxreisert

Last year, at about this time, I wrote a blog post on my wonderful experience at a weeklong clergy writing workshop. I had the great privilege to attend this year as well. Different characters this time around, but the same location and the same underwriters and hosts. I offer deep thanks to the Collegeville Institute, the Lilly Endowment and the Massachusetts Conference of the United Church of Christ for this opportunity to focus on writing, to gather in a community of writers, and to experience Sabbath, in a time and place away from the normal routines of life and ministry.

Writing can be such an isolated, and isolating, endeavor. Generally, I write—sermons, blog posts, newsletter pieces, etc.—when I am alone. A little inspiration is helpful too. The opportunity, then, to gather in a community of writers even for a week—to write, ponder, discuss and share—is time to be treasured.

This year’s workshop focused on writing as spiritual practice, and writing as a path for spiritual awakening. I found much of the workshop to be a little more challenging than I expected, and that was a very good thing. I’ve been reflecting on the writing I do and pondering a variety of ways of approaching words, images, metaphor, etc. During our week together, we also shared and talked and listened to each other. It’s hard to articulate what a vibrant, rich and nurturing atmosphere blossomed in our midst.

At the beginning of the week, our fearless leader, Karen Hering, led us in various paths of awakening, offering writing prompts utilizing simple phrases or objects that we could hold, prompts that led to colorful drawings, mapping, or reflections shaped by cutting and pasting. There were stories, essays and poems to be pondered and words with which we played. During the sessions, we sometimes talked about our writing and responses in pairs or small groups, and sometimes we did not. By the end of the week, each of us led a short writing session, each choosing a word or phrase and developing our own mini-workshop.

My word was “word.” I led the group through a process of considering the harm and the healing, the danger and the wonder, that can come from words. We focused on common, everyday words and experimented with the possibilities of the simple words of our lives and how they present the opportunity to point to the divine and profound. To demonstrate, I read from Frederick Buechner’s “The Innkeeper” from his book The Magnificent Defeat. In that short piece, Buechner offers a first-person narrative of the infamous innkeeper from the gospel of Luke, where there is no room at the inn for Mary and Joseph. The innkeeper explains that he was busy, “lost in a forest of a million trees.” He’s running a business and there’s a lot to do. So, in that transformative moment when no one became someone, when the baby uttered his first cry, the innkeeper was lost in the “unenchanted forest of a million trees,” and missed it.

Common, simple everyday words. They have the capacity to point us to significant truths, if we give them the room and the opportunity to work their magic.

Such was last week, where I read and listened to beautiful, thoughtful, provocative and evocative language, where I was invited into a group of writers. We began the week as strangers (or, as expressed in the word that was given birth during the course of the week, “strangels”—a mix of stranger and angel), but became friends, a community.

Deep and abiding gratitude to you, for your words, for your ministry, for your generosity of spirit, and for your friendship: Donna, Mary Ellen, Kevin, Will, Patricia, Vicky, Dietmar, Jen, Ellie, Geordie, and Karen. And, to Alyssa, who took such good care of us. To Ellie and Andrea from the Massachusetts Conference, for your work and care that brings this program to Massachusetts. And, to the Collegeville Institute and the Lilly Endowment, for the work you do to support and encourage clergy. I am profoundly grateful for the workshop I attended, and know that it will shape my ministry in the days, weeks, and years ahead. Thank you.

Posted in My Life as Pastor | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Exciting: A New Word for Our Small Church Vocabulary

Posted on October 25, 2016 by smaxreisert

Today, I received one of those wonderful, rare emails, a sort of email that doesn’t land in my inbox very often, an email to cherish and keep, especially when things get difficult, which they are bound to do. Today, I received an email that included the word “exciting,” as in “excited about what we’re doing at Old South.”

Here’s a little background. The Maine Conference United Church of Christ Annual Meeting was held this past weekend. A few months ago, I heard one of the coordinators worrying about what seemed like a small array of workshops. I decided to propose one that focused on lay leadership of worship. At Old South, we are doing quite a lot of lay leadership and have done so for several years. I spoke to a few people who have led worship at Old South and asked them if they would be willing to participate in a panel that would cover both the “nuts and bolts” as well as their experience of leading worship and how that has brought vitality to our small church.

A few people agreed to be a part of this workshop, but there was some noticeable skepticism: who would attend such a workshop? Would anyone be interested in this topic? I decided to ignore the questions and plow forward. We decided on a plan.

We gathered Saturday afternoon in our assigned room at Husson University. A few people joined us, and then a few more and a few more still. By the time the workshop started, we had a full room.

I introduced the topic and the lay people from Old South and then the panelists each took turns talking about how they put together worship as well as how it felt. Along the way, we mentioned the other new things we’ve been doing at Old South—whittling down to one committee, teams without terms, the elimination of the board of deacons, and an open worship sign up that encourages a variety of opportunities for people to be involved in worship.

The feeling in the room became lively and animated. Questions and answers went back and forth. Before we knew it, the hour was over. Yet, we felt as though we had only scratched the surface.

Those who attended our workshop were interested in what we are doing and understanding the process. We talked not only about the superficial aspects of what we are doing, but also the underlying, vital elements to what we do: trust and a willingness to take risks (more about these in a later blog post).

After the workshop, the panelists and I looked at each other in amazement. We could not escape the notion that we are doing something exciting. It may not be earth shattering. It may not bring a whole bunch of new members, but it felt exciting, and faithful and true to the Spirit who joins us on the journey.

We experienced a moment of wonder and grace, as well as a reminder that numbers are a poor way to measure faithfulness to the Gospel. Old South may be small, and burdened by a sanctuary that is now too big. We may encounter challenges. We may find ourselves fretful at our worship attendance that goes down bit by bit, year after year.

But, we are doing something exciting, life-giving and life-affirming. We are a community and we are church, willing to venture into new places, trusting in each other and in the God we worship. Yes, it is exciting.

Posted in On the Hopeful Side | Tagged | 1 Comment

Small Church, Big Sanctuary

Posted on October 13, 2016 by smaxreisert

While Old South is certainly one of those churches that wonders quite a lot about what the future will hold—with our small numbers, our difficulties in maintaining and paying for staff, worries about the demands of our physical plant, etc.—Old South is also a church that has a lot going for it. People genuinely care for one another. We have a shared commitment to worship as well as other aspects of our communal life. We give generously (especially given our size) to mission projects near and far.

On “low attendance” Sundays, though (and there are more of them than there used to be), it’s hard not to feel very small, and insignificant. On some Sundays, the small congregation is scattered, as singles or couples, across the sanctuary. The only group of any size is the choir, and they are, on most Sundays, significantly smaller than they were just a few years ago. Occasionally, it feels like there are just as many people in the chancel area—with the choir and me— as there are in the pews.

While those who are a part of the congregation may know about all of the things we do well as a church, it’s hard not to feel at least a little despairing, fretful and uneasy when there are so few in such a large space.

During the time I’ve been at Old South, attendance has never been what might be described as robust. When I first started, more than ten years ago, average attendance was somewhere between fifty and seventy. In a sanctuary that can hold a few hundred, it never felt full (except for Christmas Eve, Easter and a few funerals), but it didn’t feel empty either.

With average attendance now in the low 30s, worship is starting to feel empty. No matter what we say about our largeness of spirit, or that the numbers don’t matter, that faithfulness to the Gospel is the most important measure, it’s much harder when there’s so much space around us.

It’s too bad that we can’t engage in an “app” that shrinks our sanctuary as the congregation shrinks—now that would be a helpful piece of technology! Instead, we must remind ourselves to see past the empty spaces, and to see the significance of who and what we are.

This is easier said than done.

In a recent blog on the Christianity Today website, Karl Vaters argued, “small churches are a vital component of the most powerful force for goodness the world has ever seen – the gospel of Jesus lived in and through his body, the church.” [http://www.christianitytoday.com/karl-vaters/2016/october/astonishing-power-of-small-churches-looking-ahead.html]

He is absolutely right, and I’ll offer that Old South is a good example. Yet, we stumble in the doubts and worries that afflict us when we gather for worship on lots—not yet all—Sundays of the year when our smallness is not felt as a strength but a very real liability, that in our small gathering we cannot escape the notion that we’ve got ourselves into something we can’t handle. And that is the physical reality of the building around us—aging, and needing of more and more maintenance.

Vaters goes on in his blog to focus on love and encourages, “Let’s shower the world with tangible proof of God’s love.”

The challenge will be, for small congregations in large buildings—like Old South—to see if they, if we, can truly live out of God’s love, loving people more than the building in which we gather. This, I fear, will be easier said than done.

Posted in Buildings | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Who Are We? Why Are We Here?

Posted on October 4, 2016 by smaxreisert

When Admiral James Stockdale, Vice Presidential candidate in 1992, asked in the Vice Presidential debate, “Who Am I? Why Am I Here?” he was mocked mercilessly. His questions, though, actually were, and are, very important ones, questions that we all ought to ask ourselves more often—and churches too. Who are we? Why are we here?

I wrote recently about Old South’s mold problem—an unwelcome and expensive guest to evict. The Oversight Committee, after lengthy discussion regarding bids for remediation and other aspects of the problem, decided to hold an “informational meeting” for the congregation. Instead of proposing a clear plan and asking for approval, the Committee shared the information with the congregation and asked them to pray and think about how we should move forward. Though unsettling, the mold problem is not an emergency. We have a bit of time to make decisions.

What has transpired in the last couple of weeks has been quite remarkable. People have been talking not just about the mold, and the high price tag for its removal.
They are also asking key questions about the church, its purpose and existence. “Even if the money to pay for the mold remediation fell from the sky,” one woman asked me in a private conversation, “is that the best way for us to be church, to feel like we are constantly spending money to maintain the building in which we gather?” She went on to ask about the needs of our community and how we might do more about those needs. Are those needs any less of a priority than the problem that lurks in our basement? Is our primary purpose to keep standing the beautiful building in which we gather, or is it something else? Is it time to let go of the church building? Can we afford to keep maintaining it—and not just in terms of money?

These questions have been asked in various forms by various people, not just one or two people—although mostly in small gatherings of two or three, and not in the midst of larger gatherings. Still, I feel that we are experiencing a significant moment in our common lives of faith: Who are we? Why are we here?

How do we live out the notion that we are to seek justice, to love kindness and to walk humbly with our God, especially in a community where so many needs are so very present—poverty, mental illness, homelessness, addiction, domestic violence? How do we show faithfulness to the Gospel? Through our building? Or through the actions of our people?

Who are we? Why are we here? These are significant, important questions that ought be asked regularly, individually and collectively. It’s crucial that we take a moment to step back a bit, to reflect, to pray, to talk together—and to consider our purpose, our connection to Christ.

I really don’t have any idea what will happen, but I’d like to think that even if we decide to find the money to remove our unwelcome guest, that we will also discover a different, and more welcome and positive, growth—a new awareness of what it means to be church, to be the Body of Christ.

Posted in Buildings, On the Hopeful Side | Leave a comment